We use privacy-focused, aggregate website measurement to understand which pages and pathways are useful. It uses no analytics cookies or persistent identifiers, and you can turn it off at any time. We do not send form responses, workspace content, private-link tokens or advertising identifiers.
Keep every perspective, decision, and next move connected.
Consilium is the platform BPG Labs uses within complex, multi-stakeholder engagements. It gathers perspectives, structures evidence, builds shared understanding, and preserves the reasoning and ownership needed to move from a challenge into action.
Perspectives sit apart from analysis, decisions become hard to trace, and implementation teams inherit an output without the reasoning behind it. Consilium keeps that chain connected.
Hear more and see the real picture
Gather perspectives beyond the usual room while keeping common ground, disagreement, uncertainty, and missing voices visible.
Preserve the reasoning and ownership
Keep evidence connected to decisions and carry assumptions, ownership, dependencies, and learning into action.
ONE CONNECTED ENGAGEMENT
From perspective to responsible action.
Consilium supports BPG Labs engagements from discovery and system mapping through decisions, pilot design, and learning. See the full six-step BPG process →
01 · DISCOVERlisten and confirm
Hear every perspective
Private contributions stay distinct and participant-confirmed.
OUTPUTConfirmed perspectives
02 · MAPsynthesize and model
See the shared system
Evidence, assumptions, uncertainty, and disagreement remain visible.
OUTPUTA challengeable model
03 · DECIDE & DESIGNtest and decide
Choose a responsible move
Explore pathways and frame a bounded decision with clear criteria.
OUTPUTA decision or pilot
04 · PILOT & SCALEreview, learn, and adapt
Learn and adapt
Connect accepted pilot learning back to the shared model.
OUTPUTA traceable next decision
THE PLATFORM
Capabilities that make the benefits real.
Five connected capabilities carry the work from participation to a responsible next move.
DISCOVER
Adaptive AI elicitation and confirmation
Private, role-aware interviews adapt to what each participant shares. People respond in their own language and confirm what becomes shared evidence.
ADAPTIVE AI INTERVIEW · PRIVATE CONTRIBUTION
DISCOVERMAP
Facilitator-reviewed synthesis
Confirmed perspectives become a cited synthesis with tensions, evidence gaps, and missing groups visible. Facilitators decide what moves forward.
FACILITATOR REVIEW · CITED DISAGREEMENT
MAPDECIDE
Versioned system maps and relationship validation
Versioned maps connect variables, relationships, actors, and conditions while preserving evidence, uncertainty, review, and change history.
CAUSAL SYSTEM MAP · COMPLETE MODEL
DECIDEDESIGN
Directional scenarios and opportunity decisions
Teams test how a provisional intervention may move through the system. Results guide learning and opportunity decisions without being presented as forecasts.
EXPLORATORY PATHWAY · DIRECTIONAL MODEL, NOT A FORECAST
DESIGNPILOTSCALE
Initiative review and governed pilot learning
Versioned Initiative Lab records make measures, safeguards, partners, assumptions, and decision criteria reviewable. Accepted pilot findings can inform the next map without rewriting history.
INITIATIVE LAB · PILOT READINESS
THE PLATFORM · CONTINUED
And one discipline for building the answer.
Consortia are extraordinarily good at deliberating and structurally bad at deciding. That isn't a character flaw. It's what happens when everyone in the room answers to an institution that didn't send them there to concede anything. So the deliberation runs until the calendar runs out, and the output is a record of the deliberation.
The venture world hit a version of this problem twenty years ago under different pressure — a startup that deliberates dies — and built a discipline in response. Pick the wedge. Design from the binding constraint, not the wish list. Commit to the smallest thing that tests the thesis. Put a name next to it. Decide in advance what would make you stop.
Consilium runs your live sessions on that discipline, with the AI holding the structure and every participant's research advisor sitting in their own screen. Not a facilitator asking how everyone feels about the whiteboard — a process that ends the session with a costed first phase and a name against it.
But the naive version of this fails, and it fails insultingly. A consortium is not a startup. It has mandates it cannot pivot out of, constituencies it cannot break things for, and a legitimacy that speed actively destroys. So we import selectively, and we're specific about what stays behind.
IMPORTED FROM VENTURE BUILDING
Wedge selection — the narrow first cut, not the full problem
Constraint-first design — build from what's immovable
Smallest testable first phase
Named ownership, never "the working group"
Kill criteria agreed before anyone is invested
Phase gates with real teeth
DELIBERATELY LEFT BEHIND
Move fast and break things
Founder unilateralism
Pivot at will, mandate be damned
Speed as a substitute for legitimacy
Disruption as a value rather than a side effect
The assumption that incumbents are the problem
The result is the same forcing function, without the founder's licence to ignore the room. Y Combinator meets the United Nations — and the point is that both halves of that sentence are load-bearing.
PILOTS IN DEVELOPMENT
Ideas become clearer when they meet real people and places.
BPG Labs is developing pilots including Nourish Collective and Multistakeholder Drinking—practical settings for exploring how shared challenges can move from dialogue and system framing toward coordinated action.
Technology supports the process. It does not own the judgment.
Consilium is used inside a BPG Labs engagement. AI helps structure evidence; people remain responsible for representation, judgment, ownership, and action.
Participant confirmation
People can review and confirm how their contribution is represented before it becomes part of a shared briefing.
Visible gaps and trade-offs
Missing voices, uncertainty, and legitimate structural disagreement remain visible rather than being averaged away.
Traceable, human decisions
Next moves remain connected to evidence and assumptions, while BPG Labs and participants retain responsibility for judgment and action.
WHO IT'S FOR
Different institutions. Three roles in moving shared work.
Consilium is used through BPG Labs engagements. Institutions may enter as owners and conveners of a challenge, knowledge and delivery partners, or supporters who enable an initiative to progress.
Challenge owners & conveners
Consortia, foundations, government, and industry organizations that hold a mandate, commission work, or convene the system.
Knowledge & delivery partners
Academia, industry, startups, and specialists that contribute evidence, technology, access, expertise, or operating capacity.
Initiative supporters
Foundations, government, industry, and investors that provide legitimacy, networks, catalytic funding, or growth capital.
WHY US
Neither half of this works alone.
VENTURE & AI PRODUCT
Michael Sattler
Multiple-time founder and AI product and venture operator. Owns the venture-creation machinery — the part that turns a validated idea into something investable rather than something interesting.
CONSORTIA & SYSTEMS MODELLING
Brian Goodman
Consultant with deep government and industry relationships across the European marketplace. Owns the consortium relationships, the convening trust, and the system-dynamics modelling underneath the synthesis.
The Boston-to-Brussels corridor is a real and underserved seam: US technology needs to understand the European landscape, and European institutions want credible access to frontier innovation. What's hard to copy here is precisely what was hard to build.
GET STARTED
Bring a challenge that needs more than another report.
The first conversation is about the decision, opportunity, or system you need to move. BPG Labs will determine the right combination of discovery, facilitation, systems work, Consilium, and Initiative Lab support.
